Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Answer:
Following are the response to the given points:
Step-by-step explanation:
For question 5.11:
For point a:
For all the particular circumstances, it was not an appropriate sampling strategy as each normal distribution acquired is at a minimum of 30(5) = 150 or 2.5 hours for a time. Its point is not absolutely fair if it exhibits any spike change for roughly 10 minutes.
For point b:
The problem would be that the process can transition to an in the state in less than half an hour and return to in the state. Thus, each subgroup is a biased selection of the whole element created over the last [tex]2 \frac{1}{2}[/tex] hours. Another sampling approach is a group.
For question 5.12:
This production method creates 500 pieces each day. A sampling section is selected every half an hour, and the average of five dimensions can be seen in a [tex]\bar{x}[/tex]line graph when 5 parts were achieved.
This is not an appropriate sampling method if the assigned reason leads to a sluggish, prolonged uplift. The difficulty would be that gradual or longer upward drift in the procedure takes or less half an hour then returns to a controlled state. Suppose that a shift of both the detectable size will last hours [tex]2 \frac{1}{2}[/tex] . An alternative type of analysis should be a random sample of five consecutive pieces created every [tex]2 \frac{1}{2}[/tex] hour.
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.