Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

A plaintiff has brought an action for personal injuries against a store, in connection with an incident in which he slipped and fell after the store's linoleum floors had been mopped. A major issue at trial is the degree of moisture that remained on the floor, because it had been mopped 45 minutes before the plaintiff walked on it. The store offers the testimony of an expert, who will testify about an experiment he conducted measuring the amount of time necessary for a linoleum floor to dry completely after having been mopped. Under what condition should the court admit this testimony

Sagot :

Answer: It is shown that the conditions of the expert's experiment were substantially similar to the conditions of the store's floor when the plaintiff slipped.

Explanation:

The condition under which the court should admit the testimony is that it is shown that the conditions of the expert's experiment were substantially similar to the conditions of the store's floor when the plaintiff slipped.

The testimony of the expert will only be relevant and applicable of it was similar to the scenario which led to the accident. In such case, it will be admissible if it's relevant.

As long as the conditions of the experiment of the expert replicated the conditions regarding the accident, then the experiment is said to be relevant.

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.