Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Negating conditional statement (a V ~ b) => c

Please show your work and give a proper answer

Negating Conditional Statement A V B Gt C Please Show Your Work And Give A Proper Answer class=

Sagot :

LammettHash

"p implies q" is equivalent to "(p and q) or not p", which in turn is equivalent to "(p or not p) and (q or not p)". But "p or not p" is always true, so the implication reduces completely to "not p or q". Negating an implication thus gives "not (not p or q)", which is equivalent to "p and not q".

So

not [(a or not b) implies c]   <==>  (a or not b) and not c

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.