Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

A professional painter and his apprentice, in business as a partnership, were hired to paint a store. Midway through the job they ran out of paint, so the painter lent his truck to the apprentice to pick up more. On his way to pick up the paint, the apprentice stopped at a post office along the way to mail a personal letter. On pulling out of the post office parking lot, he negligently ran into a parked car, causing extensive damage.
If the car owner brings a negligence action against the painter, will she prevail?
A. No, because the apprentice is an independent contractor.
B. No, because a bailor is not vicariously liable for the torts of his bailee.
C. Yes, because the apprentice's stop at the post office was not a frolic.
D. Yes, because the apprentice was using the painter's truck.


Sagot :

Answer:

I think the answer is A.

Explanation:

The blame should be placed on the person driving the truck, not the one who owns the truck. Use the process of elimination and you can cross off D. It's not C either because that's simply unreasonable. Not B because no one said anything about bails. It has to be A. Furthermore, it mentioned, "in business as a partnership."

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.