Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
Using function concepts, we have that:
The actual percentage of smokers in 2010 was of 23%, while the estimated was of 13%, thus, the model underestimated the percentage by 10%.
-----------------------------
The function is:
[tex]p + \frac{x}{2} = 33[/tex]
In which
- p is the percentage of smokers.
- x is the number of years after 1970.
The percentage can be written as a function of the number of years, that is:
[tex]p(x) = 33 - \frac{x}{2}[/tex]
-----------------------------
2010 is 2010 - 1970 = 40 years after 1970, thus, the estimate of the percentage in 2010 is:
[tex]p(40) = 33 - \frac{40}{2} = 33 - 20 = 13[/tex]
The actual percentage of smokers in 2010 was of 23%, while the estimated was of 13%, thus, the model underestimated the percentage by 10%.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24481455
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.