Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer: Difficult, but I choose C: His conclusion is based on an assertion regarding unfairness, and unfairness is a very subjective concept.
Explanation: The ineffectiveness in Antoine's argument is, in my mind, that he is ignoring the purpose of the gasoline tax increase. The purpose is to limit petroleum consumption, not to increase revenues. The increased revenue, in fact, could be used to lower taxes. While his argument does seem to address fairness, that doesn't apply here. In fact, it would be unfair to add taxes to people who don't consume much petroleum. Furthermore, his plan would do nothing to direcly reduce petroleum consumption. Choice C came closest to this line of thought.
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.