Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Answer: Difficult, but I choose C: His conclusion is based on an assertion regarding unfairness, and unfairness is a very subjective concept.
Explanation: The ineffectiveness in Antoine's argument is, in my mind, that he is ignoring the purpose of the gasoline tax increase. The purpose is to limit petroleum consumption, not to increase revenues. The increased revenue, in fact, could be used to lower taxes. While his argument does seem to address fairness, that doesn't apply here. In fact, it would be unfair to add taxes to people who don't consume much petroleum. Furthermore, his plan would do nothing to direcly reduce petroleum consumption. Choice C came closest to this line of thought.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.