Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer:
majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Answer:
It was because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Explanation:
Majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.