Discover a wealth of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts provide answers to your most pressing questions. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer:
majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Answer:
It was because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Explanation:
Majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.