Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Answer:
It was because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Explanation:
Majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.