Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Answer:
It was because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Explanation:
Majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.