Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Get detailed and precise answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Answer:
majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Answer:
It was because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Explanation:
Majority opinion by John Marshall. Though Marbury was entitled to it, the Court was unable to grant it because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and was therefore null and void.
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.