Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Given the conditional statement ~p -> q which statement is logically equivalent?​

Sagot :

Any implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. In other words,

¬pq   ⇔   ¬qp

(¬ means the same thing as ~, "not")

To prove this: recall that

pq   ⇔   ¬pq

This is because pq is true if p is false, or both p and q are true, i.e.

pq   ⇔   ¬p ∨ (pq)

Disjunction (∨ or "or") distributes over conjunction (∧ or "and"), so that

pq   ⇔   (¬pp) ∧ (¬pq)

but ¬pp is always true, or a tautology, so we're just left with ¬pq.

Then

¬pq   ⇔   pq

…   ⇔   qp

…   ⇔   ¬(¬q) ∨ p

…   ⇔   ¬qp