Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

1. If a footpath is exposed to heavy rain, then the surface will not experience erosion.
2. This footpath is exposed to heavy rain.
3. Therefore, this footpath will not experience erosion.

Please help me determine if the argument is both sound and valid. ​


Sagot :

An argument is considered as valid if it takes a form which makes it impossible to be true.

An argument is said to be sound if it is both valid and its premises are true.

The statement 1 given is sound but not valid. There can be corrosion on the surface due to rain sometimes.

The statement 2 is both sound and valid.

Statement 3 is sound but not valid.

Learn more at https://brainly.com/question/24523213

Let understand that a "deductive argument" are valid when:

  • It takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be false.
  • If the conclusion is not false.

The sentence "If a footpath is exposed to heavy rain, then the surface will not experience erosion" is not fully established to exact a conclusion on due to the construction and premises.

  • The reason are there are footpath which were eroded even with slightest of erosion, so the argument is neither sound nor valid.

In conclusion, an argument is considered valid and sound when all of its all of its premises are actually true.

Learn more about deductive argument here

brainly.com/question/13031704