Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.