Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.