Answered

Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.