Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.