Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.