Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.