Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer and Explanation:
This act is protected under the First Amendment, although it is rude and offensive, and when seen as in a political view, almost like a threat to whoever's country the flag is from.
It is protected because it shows "symbolic speech", which is protected under the amendment.
An example of symbolic speech that was used was seen with the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court Case. The case was that students at a school were wearing black armbands to symbolize their opinion on the Vietnam war. Tinker won the case because they are allowed free speech. They also didn't speak about it or make any remark about the war, which helped in them winning the case.
Opinions that can be made against the protection of this act is that it is offensive to people, and seen as disrespectful from whoever.
#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)
I hope this helps!
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.