Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer and Explanation:
This act is protected under the First Amendment, although it is rude and offensive, and when seen as in a political view, almost like a threat to whoever's country the flag is from.
It is protected because it shows "symbolic speech", which is protected under the amendment.
An example of symbolic speech that was used was seen with the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court Case. The case was that students at a school were wearing black armbands to symbolize their opinion on the Vietnam war. Tinker won the case because they are allowed free speech. They also didn't speak about it or make any remark about the war, which helped in them winning the case.
Opinions that can be made against the protection of this act is that it is offensive to people, and seen as disrespectful from whoever.
#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)
I hope this helps!
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.