Melm84
Answered

Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

PLEASE HELP ME THIS IS FOR A TEST I WLL GIVE BRAINLIST

A. In one paragraph, describe what the Anti-Federalists would think about the size of federal government and the U.S. population today.

B. In a second paragraph, describe how court cases and public policy since the ratification of the Constitution have addressed the issues and arguments presented by the Anti-Federalists.

Sagot :

hermanc156

Answer:

A. They hate the fact the the federalist side of the government has succeeded, and create riots and rallies to show it. They think that the government should be completely centralized, and nothing else.

B. As time goes on, the constitution has changed dramatically, with court cases roving things to be out of date and not constituational. These problems have been addressed through national television, and many other ways of broadcast, and have tried to been dealt with as smoothly as possible so as to avoid an uncontrolable riot.

anthougo

A. The Anti-Federalists would think that the size of the federal government today is over-bloated. They would also think that the federal government should not meddle in the life of Americans, given the country's large population today, because the government would be too far removed.

 

The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution without the Bill of Rights. They opposed a more powerful national government than the states and local governments. They also feared that the government at the center would not be republican in nature and practice.

 

B. Various court cases and public policies, since the Constitution received ratification, have continued to address the issues and arguments by the Anti-Federalists.

 

For example, the First Amendment added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. It recognized the rights of individuals and limited the powers of the government against citizens' inalienable rights.

 

Other instances were the cases of Gibbons v. Ogden and United States v. Lopez. Through these cases, the Supreme Court has demonstrated that the concerns of the Anti-Federalists would continue to be addressed

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Court upheld the power of Congress to legislate interstate Commerce. In the United States v. Lopez, the Court upheld that Congress lacked the constitutional powers to use the Commerce Clause to legislate on a criminal matter that only the States could.

 

Thus, court cases and public policy of the government have addressed the issues and arguments of the Anti-Federalists and will continue to do so.

Read more: https://brainly.com/question/20116677

Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.