Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

PLZ HELP FAST
A scientist performed an experiment on mice. Her results are posted below.

After analyzing her results she stated that a mouse must be exposed to more than 500 days of cigarette smoke before the mouse can get lung cancer.
Do you agree with the scientist conclusions?

A.) yes; there is no evidence to support the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke for more than 500 days.

B.) No; there is no evidence to support the idea that cigarette smoke exposure will lead to lung cancer in mice.

C.) No; some mice may have developed lung cancer in less than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

D.) Yes; the majority of the lung cancer cases were the result of more than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

PLZ HELP FAST A Scientist Performed An Experiment On Mice Her Results Are Posted Below After Analyzing Her Results She Stated That A Mouse Must Be Exposed To Mo class=

Sagot :

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because there is a 500 day gap in the evidence, some mice may have gotten cancer on the first day, or the 499th day.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think it's A since her grounds or conclusions are not accurate because there is no evidence to abet the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke.

B is not accurate since an experiment was performed.