JS28boss
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Ask your questions and receive precise answers from experienced professionals across different disciplines. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

PLZ HELP FAST
A scientist performed an experiment on mice. Her results are posted below.

After analyzing her results she stated that a mouse must be exposed to more than 500 days of cigarette smoke before the mouse can get lung cancer.
Do you agree with the scientist conclusions?

A.) yes; there is no evidence to support the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke for more than 500 days.

B.) No; there is no evidence to support the idea that cigarette smoke exposure will lead to lung cancer in mice.

C.) No; some mice may have developed lung cancer in less than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

D.) Yes; the majority of the lung cancer cases were the result of more than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

PLZ HELP FAST A Scientist Performed An Experiment On Mice Her Results Are Posted Below After Analyzing Her Results She Stated That A Mouse Must Be Exposed To Mo class=

Sagot :

notaflamethrower

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because there is a 500 day gap in the evidence, some mice may have gotten cancer on the first day, or the 499th day.

crissz67

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think it's A since her grounds or conclusions are not accurate because there is no evidence to abet the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke.

B is not accurate since an experiment was performed.

Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.