Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Which of the following is an acceptable justification for Statement 2?


vertical angles are congruent

vertical angles are congruent

corresponding angles are congruent

corresponding angles are congruent

remote interior angles are congruent

remote interior angles are congruent

alternate interior angles are congruent

Sagot :

MrRoyal

Angles in a transversal of parallel lines are congruent based on several reasons.

The justification for statement 2 is: alternate interior angles are congruent

From the complete question (see attachment), the statement 2 is:

[tex]\mathbf{\angle 4 \cong \angle 5}[/tex]

Base on the positions of angle 4 and angle 5,

Angle 4 and angle 5 are in alternate positions, and they are both interior angles of the transversal that passes through the parallel lines b and c.

The highlight above means that:

The angles are alternate interior angle

So, the justification for [tex]\mathbf{\angle 4 \cong \angle 5}[/tex] is: alternate interior angles are congruent

Read more about proofs of angles at:

https://brainly.com/question/10906327

View image MrRoyal
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.