Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

There is a beautiful and peaceful girl in her death.Her scarlet lips slightly parted as though whispering a caress to her lover, her blue eyes gentle and unquestioning like a baby. The dead girl lay on the murderer's arm like a child that asleep. when the police had almost to force the murderer to let go the body of the girl he carrying. A few hours later when I saw the murderer, he was so different from the old him that abode of a tragic love. When i tried to ask questions him, I become aware of terrific strain under which he suffered. When I tried to draw from him the motive for the pitiful tragedy, he could only rely, his pale boyish face like a mask. He killed the girl,the girl he loved because of his own good'cause he want the girl to be with him alone. That's the Irony of fate! The very greatness of his love made him strangle her. Separated as they were wealth, social position, and all that implies, it was only in death that they could be united.
GUIDE QUESTIONS:
1.WHAT IS THE STORY ALL ABOUT?
2.WHAT IS THE IDEA THE AUTHOR WANTED TO SHARE?

3. WHO IS NARRATING THE STORY? HOW DOES THE NARRATOR FEEL ABOUT WHAT HAPPEN IN THE STORY?

4.DO YOU THINK THE ACT WAS JUSTIFIABLE?
PLEASE HELP ME ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOVE... THANK YOU!!!!​

Sagot :

ksyeyn
1. The story is about two lovers and how they (thought) they could only be united in death, so he killed his lover. The character thought it was the only way they could be together because of their social differences.
2. The idea the author wanted to share was that people should not have to feel like they can’t love someone just because of their social differences and where they stand
3. The detectives point of view, the narrator doesn’t really seem to feel like it was a bad thing, but wasn’t a good thing either, he didn’t really choose a side.
4. No, as murder is murder. That can not change under any circumstances, even if it was consented murder.
I LIKED READING THAT ALSO IM NOT THAT SURE ABOUT NUMBER 3, THAT WAS A LITTLE CONFUSING