Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

1. Describe what bias means, along with three guidelines you can follow to help you decide whether a source is overly biased. (4 points)

2. Do you think Lum May's testimony is overly biased? Explain why or why not. (4 points)

3. Do you think Lum May's statement is a credible source about the events of November 3, 1885, in Tacoma? Explain why or why not. (4 points)

4. Do you think James Wickersham's letter is overly biased? Explain why or why not. (4 points)

5. Do you think James Wickersham's letter is a credible source about the events of November 3, 1885? Explain why or why not. (4 points)

Sagot :

sandlee09

We can say that a person is biased when their opinion or recollection of something favors one person, idea, or group more so than the other. It is the inability to remain impartial.

Though it cannot be denied that the statement that was given by Lum May as to the events of November 3rd, 1885 may be biased, I do not believe his account of the occurrence is overly biased. He describes the violent nature of the altercation, the burning down of Chinese homes, and the trauma that overtook the sanity of his wife.

All of these statements made by Lum May are backed by evidence such as:

  • The piles of ashes where Chinese homes once stood
  • A similar recollection of the events from hundreds of Chinese citizens who were present
  • The unstable nature of his wife's mental health.

All of this leads us to believe that Lum May is a credible source for the events of November 3rd, 1885 in Tacoma.

Unlike the credible testimony of Lum May, we can infer that the letter from James Wickersham is not only extremely biased in nature, but also an overwhelmingly unreliable source of information. Many of the participants of that day were indicted for their actions, giving Mr. Wickersham much to lose were he to provide accurate information.

The evidence supporting the statements of Lum May allows us to infer that her recollection of the events is credible and not overly swayed by bias. However, the contradictory statements declared by James Wickersham and the repercussions he may face should he tell the truth, point towards his letter being an unreliable and overly biased source.

To learn more visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25061293?referrer=searchResults

We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.