Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

a political scientist or historian reviewing the opinions of chief justice john marshall in cases like mcculloch v. maryland and gibbons v. ogden would be most likely to characterize his judicial philosophy in what way?

Sagot :

Baraq

By considering the opinions of Chief Justice John Marshall in cases like McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden, a political scientist or historian would likely characterize Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy as:

"the promoter of the supremacy of the Constitution, the Congress jurisdiction, and the federal government over the states."

This is evident in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, where he supported the idea that Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce using Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution to make the ruling.

Also, McCulloch v. Maryland supported the idea that the federal government has jurisdiction over States, using the "Necessary and Proper" Clause of the U.S. Constitution as the basis.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy helped define some of the major legal issues in American history.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14437585

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.