By considering the opinions of Chief Justice John Marshall in cases like McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden, a political scientist or historian would likely characterize Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy as:
"the promoter of the supremacy of the Constitution, the Congress jurisdiction, and the federal government over the states."
This is evident in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, where he supported the idea that Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce using Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution to make the ruling.
Also, McCulloch v. Maryland supported the idea that the federal government has jurisdiction over States, using the "Necessary and Proper" Clause of the U.S. Constitution as the basis.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy helped define some of the major legal issues in American history.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14437585
