Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover in-depth solutions to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

a political scientist or historian reviewing the opinions of chief justice john marshall in cases like mcculloch v. maryland and gibbons v. ogden would be most likely to characterize his judicial philosophy in what way?

Sagot :

Baraq

By considering the opinions of Chief Justice John Marshall in cases like McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden, a political scientist or historian would likely characterize Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy as:

"the promoter of the supremacy of the Constitution, the Congress jurisdiction, and the federal government over the states."

This is evident in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, where he supported the idea that Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce using Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution to make the ruling.

Also, McCulloch v. Maryland supported the idea that the federal government has jurisdiction over States, using the "Necessary and Proper" Clause of the U.S. Constitution as the basis.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy helped define some of the major legal issues in American history.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14437585

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.