zachman20161
Answered

Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Which three statements accurately describe Munn v. Illinois?

It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.
It ruled that farmers could determine the price for storing their grain until they were ready to sell it.
It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.
It led to a commission to make sure its provisions were enforced.
It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

Sagot :

ogorwyne

The three statements that accurately describe Munn v Illinois are:

  • It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.
  • It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.
  • It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

The Munn v. Illinois case was case that developed through pressure from the Grange. The Grange were an association of farmers.

The presiding judge over the case ruled that the states had the power to regulate private businesses as long as the businesses affected the public.

Due to the fact that the storage facilities for keeping the grains were for the use of the general public, the states could regulate their rates.

Therefore the case gives us a clear example of how a protest could get the government involved in a regulation.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/11546522?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

The three statements that accurately describe Munn v Illinois are:

It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.

It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.

It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

The Munn v. Illinois case was case that developed through pressure from the Grange. The Grange were an association of farmers.

The presiding judge over the case ruled that the states had the power to regulate private businesses as long as the businesses affected the public.

Due to the fact that the storage facilities for keeping the grains were for the use of the general public, the states could regulate their rates.

Explanation:

Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.