zachman20161
Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Which three statements accurately describe Munn v. Illinois?

It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.
It ruled that farmers could determine the price for storing their grain until they were ready to sell it.
It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.
It led to a commission to make sure its provisions were enforced.
It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

Sagot :

ogorwyne

The three statements that accurately describe Munn v Illinois are:

  • It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.
  • It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.
  • It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

The Munn v. Illinois case was case that developed through pressure from the Grange. The Grange were an association of farmers.

The presiding judge over the case ruled that the states had the power to regulate private businesses as long as the businesses affected the public.

Due to the fact that the storage facilities for keeping the grains were for the use of the general public, the states could regulate their rates.

Therefore the case gives us a clear example of how a protest could get the government involved in a regulation.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/11546522?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

The three statements that accurately describe Munn v Illinois are:

It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.

It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.

It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

The Munn v. Illinois case was case that developed through pressure from the Grange. The Grange were an association of farmers.

The presiding judge over the case ruled that the states had the power to regulate private businesses as long as the businesses affected the public.

Due to the fact that the storage facilities for keeping the grains were for the use of the general public, the states could regulate their rates.

Explanation:

Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.