dl4824
Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

(PLEASE HELP )Read the passage below. Highlight the concerns of the plaintiff. Then answer the question to the right.

Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a lower court ruling that allowed a company to patent DNA sequences for two cancer genes. The patent prevents other scientists from using these DNA sequences for any reason. The company uses the DNA sequences to market kits used to identify the two types of cancer in humans. The company claims that the gene sequences are its intellectual property. it's owner feels that allowing other people to access the sequences will harm his company financially because the search for the gene sequences was very expensive.but the plaintiff in the case argue that Gene sequences are products of nature that cannot legally be patterned the plaintiff explain to the judge that the kids are very expensive as a result some patients who need these tests cannot afford to have them done.​

Sagot :

Answer:

Explanation:

I got it right

View image minecraftdud21
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.