Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Citizens United changed campaign finance laws in the following ways:
- It removed the monetary limits that corporations and individuals can spend to independently influence an election.
- It increased the amount of money spent on elections.
- It resulted in a small number of wealthy individuals having undue influence in elections.
Citizens United v FEC was a 2010 case about the disagreement relating to the amount that can be spent on elections. The Supreme Court eventually ruled 5-4 and stated that the First Amendment gave rights to companies to spend on elections and that there was no limit on such amount.
Therefore, the monetary limits that corporations and individuals can spend to independently influence an election were removed. This ensured that there was an increase in the amount of money that was spent on elections.
Also, the decision by the Supreme Court resulted in a small number of wealthy individuals having undue influence in elections.
In conclusion, Citizens United changed campaign finance laws as the limits on the amount that can be spent on elections were removed.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/19179657
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
