At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Citizens United changed campaign finance laws in the following ways:
- It removed the monetary limits that corporations and individuals can spend to independently influence an election.
- It increased the amount of money spent on elections.
- It resulted in a small number of wealthy individuals having undue influence in elections.
Citizens United v FEC was a 2010 case about the disagreement relating to the amount that can be spent on elections. The Supreme Court eventually ruled 5-4 and stated that the First Amendment gave rights to companies to spend on elections and that there was no limit on such amount.
Therefore, the monetary limits that corporations and individuals can spend to independently influence an election were removed. This ensured that there was an increase in the amount of money that was spent on elections.
Also, the decision by the Supreme Court resulted in a small number of wealthy individuals having undue influence in elections.
In conclusion, Citizens United changed campaign finance laws as the limits on the amount that can be spent on elections were removed.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/19179657
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.
