At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
OK, I'll try this. But you have to be gentle with me, because it's 43 years
since I learned it, and I've never used it except for recreation. I just hope
that I don't make a fool of myself.
The logic function you want is: X = ( A + B ) ( B C )
-- ' X ' requires B in the second parentheses.
-- So in order for ' X ' to be true, the first parentheses depends only on A .
We can completely ignore the ' B ' there, because if ' B ' is true, then ' X '
is not.
-- So the whole function reduces to X = ( A ) ( B C ) = ( A B C )
If I recall my tool box from way back then, ( A B C ) = ( A + B + C ) .
That's a law named after somebody whose name escapes me,
but I think I've applied it correctly.
Anyway, as always happens, the function can be implemented in
two different fundamental ways, on account of this guy's law.
Both of them are presented in the attachment.
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.