Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
OK, I'll try this. But you have to be gentle with me, because it's 43 years
since I learned it, and I've never used it except for recreation. I just hope
that I don't make a fool of myself.
The logic function you want is: X = ( A + B ) ( B C )
-- ' X ' requires B in the second parentheses.
-- So in order for ' X ' to be true, the first parentheses depends only on A .
We can completely ignore the ' B ' there, because if ' B ' is true, then ' X '
is not.
-- So the whole function reduces to X = ( A ) ( B C ) = ( A B C )
If I recall my tool box from way back then, ( A B C ) = ( A + B + C ) .
That's a law named after somebody whose name escapes me,
but I think I've applied it correctly.
Anyway, as always happens, the function can be implemented in
two different fundamental ways, on account of this guy's law.
Both of them are presented in the attachment.

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.