Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The argument in favor of US economic aid to other nations is invalid because the premises do not relate to the conclusion.
An argument is valid when all the premises are true and build a true conclusion.
According to the above, the argument presented has the following premises:
- Foreign economic aid to other countries is a good investment for the United States.
- It comprises only one percent of the entire federal budget, about $ 20 billion.
And the conclusion it presents is:
- Returns untold amounts in increased sales of American goods and services.
According to the above, the argument is a fallacy because the premises are not related to the conclusion because:
An investment is an economic contribution to receive a later profit, in this case, the United States is investing, and those who are receiving the profit are private US companies. Furthermore, no argument is presented that relates the increase in sales of goods and services with this investment.
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/2645376
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.