Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Sofia needs to order some new supplies for the restaurant where she works. The restaurant needs at least 566 glasses. There are currently 371 glasses. If each set on sale contains 18 glasses, which inequality can be used to determine xx, the minimum number of sets of glasses Sofia should buy?

Sagot :

mariaavila28

Answer:

371 + 18x ≥ 566

Step-by-step explanation:

Sofia needs to order some new supplies for the restaurant where she works. The restaurant needs at least 566 glasses. There are currently 371 glasses. If each set on sale contains 18 glasses, which inequality can be used to determine xx, the minimum number of sets of glasses Sofia should buy?

We know:

current # of glasses= 371

glasses per set= 18

glasses needed= 566

# of sets= x

At least means she can also have more than 566 glasses, so we will use the ≥ ("greater than or equal to") symbol:

glasses per set⋅# of sets+current # of glasses≥glasses needed

18x+371 ≥ 566

or, by the commutative property of addition,

371+18x ≥ 566

Inequality #2

We could also switch the two sides of the inequality, but we have to be careful which symbol we use. At least means the number of glasses needed should always be less than or equal to the glasses the restaurant has, including the glasses they already had, plus the sets Sofia bought.

Inequality #3

566 ≤ 18x+371

or

566≤ 371+18x

Inequality #4

We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.