Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.
