Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4b: 8.6 m/s²; 1.3×10^5 N; 2.1×10^4 N decrease
5c: -1.6×10^12 J; -1.6×10^12 J
Step-by-step explanation:
4b
i) The acceleration due to gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the objects. The distance to the shuttle is ...
1 + (5×10^5)/(6.4×10^5) = 69/64 . . . times the radius of the earth
Then the acceleration due to gravity at the height of the space shuttle is about ...
(10 m/s²)(64/69)² ≈ 8.6 m/s²
__
ii) The weight of the space shuttle at that height is about ...
F = ma = (15000 kg)(8.6 m/s²) ≈ 1.3×10^5 N
__
iii) The loss of weight will be ...
ΔF = m(a1 -a0) = (15000 kg)(10 m/s² -8.6 m/s²)
= 1.5×10^4×1.4 N = 2.1×10^4 N
____
5c
i) The gravitational potential energy is given by ...
U = -GMm/r
where M and m are the mass of the earth and the rocket, respectively.
U = -(6.67×10^-11)(6.0×10^24)(2.5×10^4)/(6.4×10^6) ≈ -1.6×10^12 J
__
ii) At a height of 3×10^4 m, the denominator in the above expression changes from 6.4×10^6 to 6.43×10^6. This changes the gravitational potential energy by a factor of 6.4/6.43 to -1.6×10^12 J
(Note: we're carrying only 2 significant figures in the result in accordance with the rules for precision in such calculations. The change is noticeable at the level of the 4th significant figure, less than 1/2%.)
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.