At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

In the case of Tarsoff v. Regents of the University of California, Podder (the patient) confided his intention to kill Tatiana to Dr. Moore. With this information, Dr. Moore notified the campus police, who briefly detained Podder but released him because he appeared rational.

Sagot :

Answer:

On October 27, 1969, Prosenjit Poddar killed Tatiana Tarasoff. fn. 1 Plaintiffs, Tatiana's parents, allege that two months earlier Poddar confided his intention to kill Tatiana to Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist employed by the Cowell Memorial Hospital at the University of California at Berkeley. They allege that on Moore's request, the campus police briefly detained Poddar, but released him when he appeared rational. They further claim that Dr. Harvey Powelson, Moore's superior, then directed that no further action be taken to detain Poddar. No one warned plaintiffs of Tatiana's. peril. Concluding that these facts set forth causes of action against neither therapists and policemen involved, nor against the Regents of the University of California as their employer, the superior court sustained defendants' demurrers to plaintiffs' second amended complaints without leave to amend. fn. 2 This appeal ensued. [17 Cal. 3d 431]

Explanation:

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.