Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

*No Links* I'll give brainlist to Whoever answers it correctly
LeighAnn needs at least 14 gallons of paint to repaint the exterior of her home. She already has 3 gallons. Only 4 stores carry the color she is looking for and each store has only 2 gallons of her color.

The inequality that represents this scenario is 2x+3≥14, where x is the number of stores LeighAnn visits to buy the paint.

Which description correctly explains whether there is a solution for this situation?

Group of answer choices

The solution to the inequality is x≥5.5. Since there is not half of a store, this can be rounded up, and LeighAnn needs to visit at least 6 stores to get enough paint for her project.

The solution to the inequality is x≥5.5. This means LeighAnn needs to visit no more than 512512 stores to get enough paint for her project.

The solution to the inequality is x≥5.5. This means there is no solution because there are only 4 stores that carry the color LeighAnn wants.

The solution to the inequality is x≥5.5. This means LeighAnn needs to visit at least 512512 stores to get enough paint for her project.

Sagot :

Answer:

The solution to the inequality is x≥5.5. This means there is no solution because there are only 4 stores that carry the color LeighAnn wants.

Step-by-step explanation:

2x+3 ≥ 14

2x ≥ 11

x ≥5.5

because ·x is the number of shop, it mean she needs 6 shops.

However there are only 4 shops that serve the paint she need.

So there is no solution.

Simple calculation and it is in the line with the actual situation

Answer:

The solution to the inequality is x≥5.5. This means there is no solution because there are only 4 stores that carry the color LeighAnn wants.

Step-by-step explanation: