Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
(C). Remember gravity provides an acceleration of 9.81m/s^2, so the y component of velocity initial is zero because it isn’t already falling, and we have the height, so basically we use the kinematic equation vf^2=vi^2+2ad, substitute given values and you get vf^2=2(9.81)(65) which is 1275, when you take the square root you get 35.7m/s for final velocity
(B). Then you use vf=vi+at to get the equation 35.7=(9.81)t, when you divide out you get 3.64s for time t
(A). Finally, since we assume that there is no acceleration or deceleration horizonatally, we just multiply the time taken for it to hit the ground and the initial speed ((3.64)(35.7)) to get 129.96, with significant figures I would round that to 130 metres.
**this is in the order that I felt was easiest to answer**
(B). Then you use vf=vi+at to get the equation 35.7=(9.81)t, when you divide out you get 3.64s for time t
(A). Finally, since we assume that there is no acceleration or deceleration horizonatally, we just multiply the time taken for it to hit the ground and the initial speed ((3.64)(35.7)) to get 129.96, with significant figures I would round that to 130 metres.
**this is in the order that I felt was easiest to answer**
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.