Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
(C). Remember gravity provides an acceleration of 9.81m/s^2, so the y component of velocity initial is zero because it isn’t already falling, and we have the height, so basically we use the kinematic equation vf^2=vi^2+2ad, substitute given values and you get vf^2=2(9.81)(65) which is 1275, when you take the square root you get 35.7m/s for final velocity
(B). Then you use vf=vi+at to get the equation 35.7=(9.81)t, when you divide out you get 3.64s for time t
(A). Finally, since we assume that there is no acceleration or deceleration horizonatally, we just multiply the time taken for it to hit the ground and the initial speed ((3.64)(35.7)) to get 129.96, with significant figures I would round that to 130 metres.
**this is in the order that I felt was easiest to answer**
(B). Then you use vf=vi+at to get the equation 35.7=(9.81)t, when you divide out you get 3.64s for time t
(A). Finally, since we assume that there is no acceleration or deceleration horizonatally, we just multiply the time taken for it to hit the ground and the initial speed ((3.64)(35.7)) to get 129.96, with significant figures I would round that to 130 metres.
**this is in the order that I felt was easiest to answer**
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.