At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer: The answer is C: He graphed the function y=cot(2x-pi/4)+1 correctly but it was not the right function to graph. He should have graphed y=cot(2x-pi/2)+1.
Explanation:
There are different ways to graph the transformation of a parent function. The fact remains that Chris did rightly graphed the function y = cot(2x - pi/4) + 1.
- Chris did not graph the right function. The best he could have done is graphed y = cot(2x - pi/2) + 1.
Why should Chris graphed y = cot(2x - pi/2) + 1.
The graphed y = cot(2x - pi/2) + 1 is right because; pi/2, implies that b must be equal to 2 (this only apply when one use the period equation for tan and cot, pi/b, For pi/b to be equivalent to pi/2, b must be 2).
The right equation is graphed y = cot(2x-pi/2)+1 because through the division of the two numbers out of the equation that is inside the parenthesis.
Then from the above, you get the graph of y = cot2(x-pi/4)+1, which is the correct equation Christ should have graphed.
Learn more about transformation from
https://brainly.com/question/6945533
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.