Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

in loving v. virginia, the supreme court ruled that virginia’s law banning marriage between persons of different races was unconstitutional under the fourteenth amendment. what attitude led many to disagree with this decision?

Sagot :

michell96

The attitude or belief that made many reject the decision in the Loving v. Virginia case is the anti-miscegenation.

In 1958, an interracial couple was sentenced to prison because they got married. This event occurred in Virginia, United States, and was justified under the Racial Integrity Act that stated people from different races could not get married.

Fortunately, this case was taken to the Supreme Court and it was determined the Racial Integrity Act approved by Virginia state was not constitutional as it violated the fourteenth amendment as the state was depriving individual rights.

Despite this, this decision was rejected by many people during this time. This is because miscegenation or interbreeding of individuals from different races was considered immoral, and therefore the idea the Supreme Court approved the marriage between people from different races was not socially acceptable.

Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/1755400

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.