Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
I'll use text forms of the logical symbols because copying/pasting on mobile is annoying.
⊕ = XOR
∨ = OR
∧ = AND
~ = NOT
↔ = IFF (meaning "if and only if")
→ = IMP (short for "implies")
and for logical equivalence I'll use a regular equal sign.
Then
p XOR q = (p OR q) AND NOT (p AND q)
(a) By definition of XOR, we have
p XOR p = (p OR p) AND NOT (p AND p)
= p AND NOT p
and this is tautologically FALSE.
(b) To rewrite XOR, first distribute the NOT over the AND using DeMorgan's law:
NOT (p AND q) = NOT p OR NOT q
Then we can interchange the AND and ORs using their respective distributive properties. That is,
p XOR q = (p OR q) AND (NOT p OR NOT q)
= (p AND (NOT p OR NOT q)) OR (q AND (NOT p OR NOT q))
= ((p AND NOT p) OR (p AND NOT q)) OR ((q AND NOT p) OR (q AND NOT q))
Both (p AND NOT p) and (q AND NOT q) are tautologically FALSE, so the truth value of either OR depends only on the other statements, so we have
p XOR q = (p AND NOT q) OR (q AND NOT p)
Recall the definition of IFF:
p IFF q = (p IMP q) AND (q IMP p)
Also recall that IMP is logically equivalent to
p IMP q = p OR NOT q
Then we have
p IFF q = (p OR NOT q) AND (q OR NOT p)
so that its negation is
NOT (p IFF q) = NOT ((p OR NOT q) AND (q OR NOT p))
= NOT (p OR NOT q) OR NOT (q OR NOT p)
= (NOT p AND q) OR (NOT q AND p)
The statements in bold match, so p XOR q is indeed equivalent to NOT (p IFF q).
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.