Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

(No false links please) [Repost]

How were the Federalists and anti federalists different with their views on how people should be represented in government?

Sagot :

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights

The differences between the Federalists and the Antifederalists are vast and at times complex. Federalists’ beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in 1787 in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense, according to the Antifederalists, of the states and the people. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution, but they never organized efficiently across all thirteen states, and so had to fight the ratification at every state convention. Their great success was in forcing the first Congress under the new Constitution to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated.

Rate as BRAINLIEST