Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

2. Write the congruence statement you are missing in order to prove the triangles are congruent for the given
reason.

2 Write The Congruence Statement You Are Missing In Order To Prove The Triangles Are Congruent For The Given Reason class=

Sagot :

TheBlueFox

A) In order to prove that these triangles are congruent by SAS, we need to have two sides of one triangle congruent to two sides of another triangle and an angle of one triangle (that’s included between the sides) is congruent to an angle of another triangle, the triangles are congruent.

We know that side OU is congruent to itself based on the reflexive property and we have a pair of right angles. However, we don’t know that sides MU is congruent to sides NU which would be our final step to prove these triangles are congruent by SAS.

So we are missing that sides MU and NU are congruent.

For part b, we have a pair of vertical angles which means they are congruent and <F and <S are congruent. For ASA, we need two angles and the included side of one triangle congruent to two angles and the included side of a second triangle.

We are not told that PQ and SQ have the same length, so this would be the information we would need to say these triangles are congruent by ASA.

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.