Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Brainliest if correct OK History Final Assessment
What did the Supreme Court rule in Worcester v Georgia?
O The Cherokee Indians had to move from their land in Georgia
O The state of Georgia had no legal power over the Cherokee
O Only state government had authority over American Indians
O US troops in any state had the right to move American Indians


Sagot :

Wankas

Answer:

The answer is: The state of Georgia had no legal power over the Cherokee

brainliest if its correct :D

Answer/Explanation:

Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land.

The Supreme Court agreed with Worcester, ruling 5 to 1 on March 3, 1832, that all the Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation were unconstitutional and thus void. The U.S. government began forcing the Cherokee off their land in 1838.

The Supreme Court case in 1832 that ruled the laws of Georgia could not control the Cherokee within their territory.

In the cases Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v.  In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations. In 1828, the state of Georgia passed a series of laws stripping local Cherokee Indians of their rights.

Hence, the answer is " The state of Georgia has no legal power over the Cherokee".