punkybrew80s
Answered

Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Explore our Q&A platform to find reliable answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Sarah and Charlie both investigated the properties of rocks they found while on a walk. Take a look at the table with their observations. What was the difference between the two sets of observations?


Sarah's Observations Charlie's Observations
The mineral was metallic. The mineral was non-metallic.
The mineral had cleavage. The mineral did not have cleavage.
The mineral was red. The mineral was red.
The mineral had luster. The mineral had luster.

a Sarah observed that the mineral was metallic and red.
b Charlie observed that the mineral was red and had luster.
c Sarah observed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic.
d Charlie observed the mineral was non-metallic and had luster.

Sagot :

895081

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Chybie

Answer: C. Sarah observed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic.

Explanation: The answer is C because the question is asking about the difference in their observations. Sarah claimed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic, while Charlie said the opposite.

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.