Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Why did Hamilton say that a Bill of Rights was not necessary to be added to the Constitution? A) The national and state constitutions were already a bill of rights guaranteed by the people. B) The Bill of Rights were already ample and of a precise manner within the convention. C) Great Britain had a Bill of Rights under which many were born under and had protection. D) The people had natural rights that could not be taken away by the government.

Sagot :

RFL987

Answer:

           Answer is A, "The national and state constitutions were already a bill of rights guaranteed by the people."

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.