Answered

Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

3. Look at the confirmation votes for the nominees
before the 2000s.
a. What pattern do you notice? Are there any
exceptions?
For every 2 years the 3 year is close in conformation
votes.
b. Compare the president's political party and the
majority party in the Senate. What influence
do these two factors seem to have had on
whether the nominees were confirmed?

Sagot :

anthougo

a. The pattern of the confirmation votes for the nominees shows that most nominees favor the president's political inclinations and thoughts, while those whose nominations were not confirmed happened when the Senate majority did not come from the president's party.

There are no noticeable exceptions to the pattern of the confirmation votes, which tend to indicate that the party in the majority in the Senate usually confirms the nominees more than the party in the minority.

b. The confirmation votes have always followed a predictable pattern. When the president's political party aligns with the Senate majority party, most nominees are confirmed, sometimes without much debate.

Thus, we can conclude that the president's political party and the majority party in the Senate always influence the confirmation of the nominees or their rejection, as the case may be.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/19243990

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.