Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Those who argue that justices should be willing to step in and overturn laws when they see a need to are described as supporting

Sagot :

It should be noted that the people who argue that justices should be willing to overturn laws are known to be supporting judicial activism.

Judicial activism simply refers to the practice in the judiciary of protecting the individual rights of an individual through the decisions that depart from the precedents that are already established.

It's about the willingness of a judge to be able to strike down another governmental branch or overturn a judicial precedent. They enforce their own views regarding constitutional requirements.

Learn more about justice on:

https://brainly.com/question/25756666