Answered

Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

whoever is good at english answer these pls :)

Read the passage below and explain which rhetorical appeals it shows below: ethos, pathos or logos? include all you see and tell me why. Also include a rhetorical device!!



And then I explained to him how naive we were, that the world did know and remain silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the
oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes wa must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must - at that
moment - become the center of the universe.

Sagot :

Answer:

Pathos

Explanation:

The article is moving to a more sympathetic yet moving tone, which would be Pathos. Pathos can be described as something that could evoke an emotion such as pity or sadness.

22phamvn

Answer:

Ethos: appeals to status/authority

Pathos: appeals to the emotions

Logos: appeals to audience's reason with logical arguments

Knowing these^^:

For me, I would argue:

This passage, as itself, is an anecdote, as the writer speaks from their perspective: "I explained to him...". As this is an anecdote and addressing worldwide issues, the writer effectively incorporates the use of ethos and pathos. With ethos, the writer sheds light on the dangers of society today. With an urge for action, the writer throughout the passage uses parallelism, claiming "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented". The use of this parallelism heightens the importance of the writer's encourged action, putting an emphasis on the negative effects caused by inaction and silent responses to these dangers. The writer also includes pathos, appealing to the writer's audience who are aware and/or are suffering the very same issues presented, using cacophonous word choices such as "persecuted" along side other controversial topics like "race, religion, or political views". The writer clearly chose such words to evoke the audience's emotion about these topics, aiding in the writer's call to action.

hope this helpsss feel free to add to this im just trying to get an answer fast enough  just in case :D

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.