Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

A remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $15,000 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1,500. A new power line will cost $13,000 to install, with power costs expected to be $1,200 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 14% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis?

Sagot :

madicuf0301

Answer:

Since the total future worth of running an electric line of $19,353.42 is less than the total future worth of solar cells is $24,132.22, it will be cheaper to run an electric line than to use solar cells. So running an electric line should be the answer.

Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.