Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.