Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.