Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

greenberg’s argument most differs from hietala’s in that greenberg claims that

Sagot :

Greenberg's argument is different in that it shows that Americans did not believe that Mexicans in the new territory could assimilate and adapt to American culture.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Greenberg was debating the adaptation of Mexican territories and people after the Mexican-American war.
  • While some people argued that assimilating these territories would be a very simple and easy thing to do, Greenberg took a different stance.

He stated that most Americans had doubts that such assimilation would be possible and believed that it would not be easy. He stated that due to cultural, moral, behavioral, and even ancestry differences, some Mexicans would not be able to adapt and assimilate into the new territory.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/19268585