Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Get detailed and precise answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

greenberg’s argument most differs from hietala’s in that greenberg claims that

Sagot :

Greenberg's argument is different in that it shows that Americans did not believe that Mexicans in the new territory could assimilate and adapt to American culture.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Greenberg was debating the adaptation of Mexican territories and people after the Mexican-American war.
  • While some people argued that assimilating these territories would be a very simple and easy thing to do, Greenberg took a different stance.

He stated that most Americans had doubts that such assimilation would be possible and believed that it would not be easy. He stated that due to cultural, moral, behavioral, and even ancestry differences, some Mexicans would not be able to adapt and assimilate into the new territory.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/19268585