Juror 4 is openly racist and prejudiced juror. However, jurors 7, 10 and 4 also show prejudiced opinions.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The defendant is a poor immigrant who lives in a marginalized region.
- These characteristics should not be relevant in determining the man's guilt or innocence, but jurors 3 and 10 use them exaggeratedly to make their decision.
- Jurors 3 and 10 make racist and xenophobic statements, presenting negative and harmful to all immigrants as if they all committed crimes.
- They are not evaluating the evidence, but arriving at conclusions in a racist way.
- Jurors 4 and 7 also make prejudiced statements, but this time, to poor people, who live in low-income regions.
"The 12 Angry Men," tells the story of a man who goes to trial accused of killing his father and is evaluated by 12 different jurors.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/1227832
