Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Neil Thisse is a Loyalist who fled the colonies during the Revolution and has returned to reclaim his property in Dover, MA. According to the Treaty of Paris, he is entitled to his land. However, Massachusetts has passed a law that ignores the claims of former Loyalists. Neil appeals to the Articles for the return of his property. Can the Articles of Confederation solve this problem? Why/Why not?

Sagot :

001169245

Answer:

According to the particular situation of Neil Thisse, the Articles of the Constitution could not have helped him to recover property rights of his land.

Explanation:

Although Mr. Thisse was a Loyaist, the new rules of the Continental Congress and the state delgates were still struggling to consolidate the new government. In accordance to the Articles and the Treaty of Paris, Mr. Thisse did not have option to negotiate with the local government of MA an agreement to reclaim his manor.

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.