Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
a. The ball would have been in flight for approximately [tex]15.3\; {\rm s}[/tex].
b. The range of the ball would be approximately [tex]3.31 \times 10^{2}\; {\rm m}[/tex].
c. The ball would have travelled approximately [tex]2.76 \times 10^{2}\; {\rm m}[/tex] further than it would have travelled on the earth.
In a projectile motion, quantities such as acceleration and velocity are vectors. By convention, if a vector quantity is one-dimensional in the vertical direction (e.g., vertical velocity,) that quantity should be greater than zero (no negative sign) if it points upwards and negative otherwise.
Explanation:
The question states that the initial velocity of this ball is [tex]v = 25\; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}}[/tex] and points upwards with an elevation angle of [tex]30^{\circ}[/tex]. Decompose this velocity into horizontal and vertical components:
Horizontal component:
[tex]\begin{aligned}v_{x} &= v\, \cos(30^{\circ}) \\ &= 25\; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}} \times \cos(30^{\circ}) \\ &\approx 21.651\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}\end{aligned}[/tex].
Vertical component:
[tex]\begin{aligned}v_{y} &= v\, \sin(30^{\circ}) \\ &= 25\; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}} \times \sin(30^{\circ}) \\ &= 12.5\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}\end{aligned}[/tex].
If the air resistance on the ball is negligible, the mechanical energy of the ball would be conserved. Thus, the kinetic energy of the ball would be the same at launch and right before the ball lands.
The magnitude of the vertical velocity of the ball would be the same at launch and right before landing, but the direction would be the exact opposite. The initial vertical velocity of the ball would be [tex]12.5\; {\rm \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}}[/tex] while the final vertical velocity of the ball would be [tex](-12.5\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1})[/tex] right before landing (the negative sign suggests that the final velocity of the ball would be pointing downwards.)
The change in the vertical velocity of this ball would be:
[tex]\begin{aligned} &\Delta v_{y} \\ &= (\text{final $v_{y}$}) - (\text{initial $v_{y}$}) \\ &= (-12.5\; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}}) - (12.5\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) \\ &= (-25\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) \end{aligned}[/tex].
The gravitational acceleration on the earth is approximately [tex](-9.8\; \rm m\cdot s^{-2})[/tex] (negative since this acceleration points toward the ground.) The acceleration on the moon would be approximately [tex]a_{y} = (-1.6333\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-2}})[/tex].
Divide the change in vertical velocity by the vertical acceleration to find the duration of this projectile motion would be:
[tex]\begin{aligned}t &= \frac{\Delta v_{y}}{a_{y}} \\ &\approx \frac{(-25\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-2}})}{(-1.6333\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-2}})} \\ &\approx 15.31\; {\rm s} \end{aligned}[/tex].
If air resistance is negligible, the horizontal velocity of this ball would be constant. The range of the ball (horizontal distance that the ball travelled) would be:
[tex]\begin{aligned} & \text{range} \\ &= v_{x}\, t \\ &\approx 21.651\; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}} \times 15.31\; {\rm s} \\ &\approx 3.31 \times 10^{2}\; {\rm m} \end{aligned}[/tex].
Similarly, with [tex]a_{y}(\text{earth}) \approx (-9.8\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-2})[/tex], the duration of the projectile motion of this ball on the earth would be [tex]t(\text{earth}) \approx 2.5510\; {\rm s}[/tex] (exactly one-sixth the duration on the moon.) The range of this ball would be approximately [tex]55.2\; {\rm m}[/tex] (one-sixth the range on the moon.)
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
