Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Read the two arguments below, which both have the same purpose: to convince the reader to buy a certain kind of camera. Identify the kind of appeal used in each passage. Then explain which of the two you think is more effective and why.
Passage
Passage 1:
As Americans, we value freedom more than anything: the wide-open prairie, an endless highway, the chance to simply get up and go explore new frontiers. So why would we want to lug around a giant camera that slows us down, that keeps us from getting to that unknown point where the perfect shot awaits? The XL-5 is no bigger than a credit card, so you have no more excuses. The only thing standing between you and snapping a pic of your next great adventure is . . . you.

Passage 2:
There are many cameras on the market today, but only one meets the three major criteria that consumers are looking for. In a recent survey of 10,000 electronics customers, over 90 percent claimed they wanted a camera under $99, small enough to fit in your pocket, and with top-end resolution. That seemed impossible . . . until now. Introducing the XL-5. If it's right for 90 percent of consumers, chances are it's right for you. Get yours before they're gone.

Sagot :

Answer:

passage 2

Explanation:

it makes people to know how easy it is to carry

gabby5792

In an English perspective, Passage 1 uses an appeal of Pathos.

This means appealing to the reader/consumer's values and emotions. They try to appeal to the American value of freedom.

Passage 2 uses an appeal method of Logos, by presenting monetary statistics and incentives.

Personally, I think Passage 2 is more effective. People, no matter their background, want something inexpensive and high quality. Maybe not all Americans value freedom as Passage 1 suggests. Or maybe, the entire market is not even American. Passage 1's path of appeal is very limited.

Additionally, Passage 1 seems a bit forward and too emotional.

Passage 2 makes consumers act quick by telling us to "get yours before they're gone!"- a pretty smart marketing tactic. And it gives a sense of hope by saying" that seemed impossible... until now"  

We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.