Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, what did the State of Maryland argue?

Banks cannot be created by Congress.
States can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.
A federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.
Banks may only be created by Congress, not by individuals.

Sagot :

Wallameg000

Answer:

States can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.

Explanation:

This case surrounded the situation where Maryland attempted to tax the federal banks within the state. Maryland argued that the state was allowed to tax any institutions within their borders. McCulloch refused to pay these taxes and the case went to the Supreme Court. The court, headed by Marshall, ruled in favor of McCulloch.

Marshall stated, "That the power to tax involves the power to destroy.  If the states may tax one instrument, employed by the [federal] government in the execution of its powers, they may tax any and every other instrument." This shows how Marshall and the other Justices disagreed with Maryland.

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.