Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, what did the State of Maryland argue?

Banks cannot be created by Congress.
States can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.
A federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.
Banks may only be created by Congress, not by individuals.

Sagot :

Wallameg000

Answer:

States can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.

Explanation:

This case surrounded the situation where Maryland attempted to tax the federal banks within the state. Maryland argued that the state was allowed to tax any institutions within their borders. McCulloch refused to pay these taxes and the case went to the Supreme Court. The court, headed by Marshall, ruled in favor of McCulloch.

Marshall stated, "That the power to tax involves the power to destroy.  If the states may tax one instrument, employed by the [federal] government in the execution of its powers, they may tax any and every other instrument." This shows how Marshall and the other Justices disagreed with Maryland.

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.