Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Why would president Jackson’s response to the Court’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia be considered an example of a breakdown of the principles of checks and balances?

Why Would President Jacksons Response To The Courts Decision In Worcester V Georgia Be Considered An Example Of A Breakdown Of The Principles Of Checks And Bala class=

Sagot :

The Supreme Court agreed with Worcester, ruling 5 to 1 on March 3, 1832, that all the Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation were unconstitutional and thus void. Andrew Jackson declined to enforce the Supreme Court's decision, thus allowing states to enact further legislation damaging to the tribes.
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.