lizg35625
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Why would president Jackson’s response to the Court’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia be considered an example of a breakdown of the principles of checks and balances?

Why Would President Jacksons Response To The Courts Decision In Worcester V Georgia Be Considered An Example Of A Breakdown Of The Principles Of Checks And Bala class=

Sagot :

Di3g053
The Supreme Court agreed with Worcester, ruling 5 to 1 on March 3, 1832, that all the Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation were unconstitutional and thus void. Andrew Jackson declined to enforce the Supreme Court's decision, thus allowing states to enact further legislation damaging to the tribes.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.