lizg35625
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Why would president Jackson’s response to the Court’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia be considered an example of a breakdown of the principles of checks and balances?

Why Would President Jacksons Response To The Courts Decision In Worcester V Georgia Be Considered An Example Of A Breakdown Of The Principles Of Checks And Bala class=

Sagot :

Di3g053
The Supreme Court agreed with Worcester, ruling 5 to 1 on March 3, 1832, that all the Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation were unconstitutional and thus void. Andrew Jackson declined to enforce the Supreme Court's decision, thus allowing states to enact further legislation damaging to the tribes.
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.