Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of flag burning as a form of free speech Answer A: flag burning as a form of free speech A the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity Answer B: the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity B prohibiting Japanese workers from immigrating to the United States Answer C: prohibiting Japanese workers from immigrating to the United States C private prayer in public schools Answer D: private prayer in public schools D excluding Japanese American children from California public schools

Sagot :

jayilych4real

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of

  • B. The internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity

What is a Court Ruling?

This refers to the decision of a competent court based on the available facts and evidences about a particular case.

With this in mind, we can see that the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity because of the Pearl Harbor bombing by the Japanese Navy.

Read more about court ruling here:
https://brainly.com/question/17040608

We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.