At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of flag burning as a form of free speech Answer A: flag burning as a form of free speech A the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity Answer B: the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity B prohibiting Japanese workers from immigrating to the United States Answer C: prohibiting Japanese workers from immigrating to the United States C private prayer in public schools Answer D: private prayer in public schools D excluding Japanese American children from California public schools

Sagot :

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of

  • B. The internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity

What is a Court Ruling?

This refers to the decision of a competent court based on the available facts and evidences about a particular case.

With this in mind, we can see that the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity because of the Pearl Harbor bombing by the Japanese Navy.

Read more about court ruling here:
https://brainly.com/question/17040608