Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of flag burning as a form of free speech Answer A: flag burning as a form of free speech A the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity Answer B: the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity B prohibiting Japanese workers from immigrating to the United States Answer C: prohibiting Japanese workers from immigrating to the United States C private prayer in public schools Answer D: private prayer in public schools D excluding Japanese American children from California public schools

Sagot :

jayilych4real

The Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of

  • B. The internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity

What is a Court Ruling?

This refers to the decision of a competent court based on the available facts and evidences about a particular case.

With this in mind, we can see that the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States upheld the constitutionality of the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity because of the Pearl Harbor bombing by the Japanese Navy.

Read more about court ruling here:
https://brainly.com/question/17040608

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.