Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

In this conversation, which group discussion technique does Emily most
clearly show?
HAN:
Even though he's saying that the radiation hasn't made
Japan's exported food dangerous to eat, he's pulling out all
the stops to make it seem as if Japan really messed things
up, even though there's proof the disaster couldn't be
prevented.
EMILY:
So you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how Japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
A. Challenging established ideas
B. Using evidence to support a conclusion

Sagot :

Drawholic01

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think that A is the answer because there is no evidence to support what Emily is saying therefore rules out option B.

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.