Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover in-depth solutions to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

In this conversation, which group discussion technique does Emily most
clearly show?
HAN:
Even though he's saying that the radiation hasn't made
Japan's exported food dangerous to eat, he's pulling out all
the stops to make it seem as if Japan really messed things
up, even though there's proof the disaster couldn't be
prevented.
EMILY:
So you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how Japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
A. Challenging established ideas
B. Using evidence to support a conclusion

Sagot :

Drawholic01

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think that A is the answer because there is no evidence to support what Emily is saying therefore rules out option B.

We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.