Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

In this conversation, which group discussion technique does Emily most
clearly show?
HAN:
Even though he's saying that the radiation hasn't made
Japan's exported food dangerous to eat, he's pulling out all
the stops to make it seem as if Japan really messed things
up, even though there's proof the disaster couldn't be
prevented.
EMILY:
So you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how Japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
A. Challenging established ideas
B. Using evidence to support a conclusion

Sagot :

Drawholic01

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think that A is the answer because there is no evidence to support what Emily is saying therefore rules out option B.

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.